Friday, April 30, 2004
Each stapler you've nicked from the office or cab fare you've overclaimed would eventually come back to haunt you some day, believe it or not. The one day you might have to stand up against a bigger fraud, your past no doubt would pull you back into the shadows because you are part of this greater scheme, in a smaller sense. I might as well have been talking about myself because I stand here, as a past recipient and a repeat offender the couple of times I've been set loose in a corporate environment. Indeed, in a way, I am.
The many unrepentant see it as a fringe benefit (cheapskate in local speak) that makes up for the actual remuneration package. It is beyond the monetary value of each item nicked, but an invisible class struggle of sorts to demonstrate self-declared ownership over office-procured stationery amidst oppression and lousy colleagues. Could likewise be the ties (or paper clips, for the matter) that bind likeminded subordinated souls in the face of disapproving managers. It all strangely adds up to motivation and cheap thrills, every passing day somewhat more tolerable in view of potential frills.
The school of thought I subscribe to, is that the more we submit to such a syndicated movement, the less likely we would be to whistleblow on our colleagues. Even if we do, it is not so much in the selfless promotion of righteousness but rather to get back at someone or to make a self-enhancing wise (albeit still highly debatable) career move. Habits no doubt will snowball, but is zero tolerance, as LKY-prescribed, the way to go? The management may feel it a small price to pay for happy staff and perceived benefits yet how ironic it is that fraud in moderation is erm, the key to escaping 42-year jailterms and outright prosecution.
Thursday, April 29, 2004
Wednesday, April 28, 2004
Sunday, April 25, 2004
Saturday, April 24, 2004
"We are all weaker today following this loss," said Michael Bidwell, Cardinals' vice president.
I can understand that, because it echoes the very thought that had gone through my mind so many times since the incident. His passing had made me more empathetic to deaths around me; I don't look at another grieving person quite the same again. Not that I didn't feel for another person's sorrow previously, I can't pinpoint exactly the subtle difference, but I know a (positive) change has been imprinted on me. My thoughts are with Mr. Heng Yeow Peow's family.
Thursday, April 22, 2004
Wednesday, April 21, 2004
Tuesday, April 20, 2004
(I seem to sound way angrier than I really am; Letting off some steam in the thick of the heat, probably.)
Monday, April 19, 2004
I didn't think I even felt all that friendly today. Was it a coincidence that they were both expats? Are such the lingering traces of leftover colonial traits, and an over-eager subservient attitude to please O superior white masters? Would I have done the same to fellow Asians? Maybe I ponder too much, over two unpremeditated events. Do I sense self-denial, eh? What I'm absolutely sure of though, is that this society has gotten too self-centered, this has got to be it, among other unflattering reasons. Why else would I get so uptight and cynical over harmless friendly greetings? You tell me.
Sunday, April 18, 2004
Saturday, April 17, 2004
On Friday, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi was irked when asked about their desire to return.
"A great number of people in the government, forgetting food and sleep, worked for their rescue … They should realise this," said Mr Koizumi, who faced the worst crisis of his administration as Tokyo worked for their release.
The foreign ministry said Tokyo would bill the three for part of the cost of chartering an aircraft to transport them from Baghdad to Dubai.
The three would also have to pay for a medical check-up and the flight from Dubai to Japan.
Most likely, we won't know the exact circumstances that had resulted in their kidnapping or release, but I find it ridiculous that they should be made to give up what they had originally set out to do. There's nothing wrong in returning home to announce their safety and give thanks, but lives shouldn't be changed just because of this episode. If it does, the Saraya al-Mujahedeen (Mujahedeen Brigades) would have, well sort of, succeeded in achieving their aims. I don't see why Koizumi should be irritated other than for reasons linked to his political endeavors. To him and his cronies, such episodes would always result in hard-to-handle crisis situations that diplomats want to avoid unlike model PR babies-carrying trigger-happy events. No matter how politically-correct the administration would in the end put it, to me it will simply be vengeance 'killing' on their part by billing the three on the costs incurred to transport them safely back to Japan. Don't governments of today uphold and value individual rights... at all? Considering that the governments might have secretly paid off the terrorists or concluded some under-the-table deals to secure releases, they probably don't.
On an unrelated note, N just called to say he's back, fresh off the tarmac. A close shave with unpunctuality, it is barely seconds to Saturday. Not that I minded, though.
Friday, April 16, 2004
I had not felt so genuinely happy in a long while. I was tired out after all the activities but yesterday was awesome indeed, not to forget that it was a day-off from all projects-related matters. As the Peace Boat students coordinator (Singapore), I had a great time working with J the international coordinator and making sure that everyone else would enjoy themselves during this cultural exchange. Through it all, I got to board a docked ship, resisted temptation to purchase duty-free Baileys/Absolut (and regretting it), was sabotaged by J to make an impromptu speech to a crowd of 100+ and met R, this exchange student from school who is in ROTC (!). By chance, we didn't know each other until he signed up for this event; we promise to hang out before he returns to US this May.
Thursday, April 15, 2004
Long-Distance Call
Definition: [n] a telephone call made outside the local calling area
Facts appear cold and impersonal, but truth warms the heart in fact.
Tuesday, April 13, 2004
The danger of chest pain:
It is important to know that restricted blood flow to the heart:
• usually occurs before the heart attack happens.
• may happen days, weeks, or even months before the heart attack occurs.
• may be mild and easy to ignore.
• may be confused with indigestion.
• may be confused with sore muscles.
Warning signs of a heart attack:
In some, but not all, cases, the body will send warning signs that indicate a heart attack. These include:
• uncomfortable pressure, fullness, squeezing, pain, or discomfort in the center of the chest that lasts for more than two minutes. This pain may be persistent, or may go away and return.
• pain or discomfort that spreads to the shoulders, neck, or arms
• pain, sweating, nausea, or shortness of breath.
• any chest discomfort that causes anxiety or concern
• any chest discomfort that is accompanied by lightheadedness, fainting, or dizziness
• any of the above symptoms that disappear with rest, then return with exertion
• unexplained weakness or fatigue
• palpitations, cold sweat, or paleness
I just googled a search on the above, not for no reason. I had experienced a sharp squeeze/tug at my heart as I was feeling extremely stressed over my workload when I was about to leave school just now. I know this is not the grieving heartache I have been experiencing; I have never felt this way before. I can't help it but think that this might be exactly what had happened to him moments, or days before he collapsed. I tried to calm myself down, breathe deeply and relax, as I walked to the bus-stop. I don't know what is happening to me. Possibly anything.
Monday, April 12, 2004
- He reads fragments of the blog over the telephone.
- He does not carry a mobile, for the weirdest of reasons to most.
- He likes to read about what is blog-written about him.
- He will fly to Oz tomorrow evening (but be back by
- He is intrigued by all the attention he is getting, those stares!
- He wants to sell off his cousin to your girlfriends, or mine for that matter.
Sunday, April 11, 2004
Update: Just realized there is a minimum 25/23 patrons age at venue. Argh.
Like spring
that flickers this hot summer,
you never know the weather can fluctuate at
the rate of a heartbeat
unbelieveable, voice from a hidden guise can
smother the dullness out of
a day
looking forward to hearing from you
never had sounded so
real, freshly-inhaled. The lifeless cell lies limp
on the table, yearning to be stroked
into hopes
dancing dreams come alive.
the calming effect, a gaslit flame.
This pulse of affections
has asphyxiated me in
all of you.
Friday, April 09, 2004
Beats me either, what this is all about. But it makes me smile.
These guys are no different. They excel in what they do, and there's only so much federal tax dollars can do. That's why, to quote them in their own words, their existence since 1996 has been "to fulfill the anticipated demand for government outsourcing of firearms and related security training."
The dangers they face don't get noticed until things happen. So don't call them mercenaries. Right, they are professional soldiers who receive better compensation, but they too are working towards rebuilding Iraq, albeit in a slightly different form, in today's corporatized world.
Thursday, April 08, 2004
In general, the foreign privilege phenomenon seems to be more pronounced in Latin America and Eastern and Central Europe, although it exists in East Asia as well.
“To entice the same level of investment, a host government may have no choice but to treat foreign firms better,” he writes. “… Some of the most authoritarian countries in the world – China now and Singapore in the 1970s and 1980s – are among the top recipients of FDI in the world.”
Times have changed, we do that to people here now. It can be interesting to note that this article applies equally to the source-of-human-resource debates in the ever-relevant foreign talent, local heartlanders issue.
Huang also raised the possibility that foreign firms’ relative lack of participation in the social and cultural affairs of a nation may actually make them more likely to be favored. “Precisely because foreigners do not participate in some countries, politicians like them more. If politicians seek to maximize control and domestic firms participate in politics, then maybe the politicians want foreigners to come. They don’t want [domestic] firms to meddle with their policymaking.”
It hits you in the face, that the government's seemingly-cosmopolitan hip Uniquely Singapore democratic less-censorship more-gum trendy facade perhaps is hiding an agenda no less sinister than this.
Wednesday, April 07, 2004
I sit now in class, my first test down (and out). The greater of the two evils will claim its first victims later at 2pm sharp. As drones on linear programming continue, I digest half-heartedly, the coffee/muffin contents of my final brunch.
Tuesday, April 06, 2004
This is probably a cumulative result of eating less, irregular sleeping hours, some exercise, and more recently, his death, my sorrow. Ok, I wouldn't exactly make a fuss if I get to shed another two kilos off... but I want my weight to remain this way, sorrow included. I don't want time to heal anything because with time, the surest and only thing that can happen is him fading away.
Monday, April 05, 2004
"If any one cuts the ear of another, his ear is to be cut in return," wrote the sheikh. "If he inflicts any physical damage on anyone, he should be retaliated against in the same manner. In case of war, Muslims are allowed to take vengeance for their mutliated dead strugglers in the same way it was done to them."
The sheikh cited the Quranic verse: "If ye punish, then punish with the like of that wherewith ye were inflicted. But if ye endure patiently, verily it is better for the patient."
The Fallujah incident last week demonstrated not for the first time, the perspectival, cultural and response asymmetry in this war. Right from the onset, we are able to see how Americans deal with and react to situations according to the principles of international law, simply because it is deemed a civilized superpower. We also witness how many Iraqis still retort to the unjust occupation by the basis of misinterpreted religious teachings and primitive barbaric means. While military asymmetry might have tweaked the war to the coalition troops' advantage, its commanders remain mere hostages to the game and its soldiers, vulnerable victims to random destructive acts by an enemy who does not play by the rules.
On another note, the superiority of the arms technology does not determine the level of barbaric atrocity. Killings in a war could be justifiable homicide, but no matter how far along we attempt to stretch, mutilation is beyond justification, primarily an act of vengeance that runs tangents off the customary laws of war. In following the argument, the sophistication of weaponry too, may not justify the killings of hundreds of soldiers as well. Explosives used in modern warfare is also capable of killing and mutilating soldiers beyond recognition, in lack of complete remains. Technical failure is common resulting in missed targets and civilian casualties - is that not an act of barbaric atrocity as well, regardless of the 'intention' defence since both paths would result in the same carnage?
Undoubtedly, this will lead to the question of (intended and accidental) participants in the war, where combatant killings are not considered criminal acts but where combatant-civilian killings weigh on a mixed bag of other issues. You may want to go here for a well-written comprehensive analysis which has delved into the said issues, in particular on the - combatant or non-combatant - definition of the contractors' status.
Sunday, April 04, 2004
LOST
Are you lost, little one?
Don't know how you got here,
or where you're going now?
What does being lost feel like?
Do you feel scared, like I do
when I'm lost?
Or upset, like when
I've lost?
Maybe you're in that
warm, secret, fuzzy compartment
hiding in the dryer
where all my lost socks have gone...
You know, through it all
I've always admired you.
And some day, I'll get lost,
and be together with you.
Saturday, April 03, 2004
To call this moving on would be politically correct but not wholly appropriate, because I am not the bystander consoling his distraught friends nor am I the emotionally detached reader who flips the newspaper page over. The fact of the matter is, you* are not me. It is not your fault, or mine, if you are helpless. I appreciate the concern but some people (no specific persons in mind) do get on my nerves with their advice and queries. Sorry if I have not been replying to text or instant messages, I just don't feel like it. You might not be what I am making you out to be, I might not have been talking about you even. But, if I'm not talking to you yet, that probably means I am not ready to yet. I still need some space. Not your fault, or mine. You were just trying to be nice. And I know that.
* Implies plural usage at all times in this entry
Friday, April 02, 2004
Then I see you standing there
Wanting more from me
And all I can do is try
Then I see you standing there
Wanting more from me
And all I can do is try
Try
I had thought I just might be able to meet N for a while in the morning. To be frank, it was the only (cheerful) thing that had kept me going all week. I'm not mad or anything because I know how much the other thing means to him. Am just disappointed. I thought I could do with a boost of sorts somewhere, in between now and the trying times of my week to come. Note forcible participation in three tough tests. Well, in the end, things did turn out to be exactly what had been in my mind all along, just a thought.
Afternote: The eventual phone call and doggie thing did presumably make up for the hasty turn of events.
Thursday, April 01, 2004
I have actually begun feeling slightly better but I haven't been able to refrain from feeling guilty. Guilt weighs down my every unwilling step towards normalcy. Have I already stopped grieving, my feelings dulled since? Memories hurt, but do not seem to pierce as much. This is what I have been dreading all along, isn't it? Gradual detachment. Has my mind filed him into a memory slot already, even before the tears have dried? Somewhere inside of me, I know I do not want to recover from the trauma. To move on would mean losing yet another piece of him, I cannot afford that, not now not ever.